TITAN 4000 Series: make the router comparison about your job mix

Park's catalog identifies TITAN 4700 and 4800 models within its CNC router offering. A family-level listing is a starting point, but it does not replace a configuration-specific proposal. Park machine catalog.

Show the mix, not one convenient part

Prepare a sample of the work the router would receive: large pieces, small pieces, repeated shapes, and jobs requiring different finishing steps. Note which jobs arrive together and which need to ship first. This helps turn a conversation about table size into a conversation about scheduling.

Ask the supplier to explain the proposed setup for each example, including preparation outside the machine. Keep the operator's work, programming work, and machine time separate in the evaluation sheet. Combining them into one headline number makes it difficult to see where your own staffing assumptions differ.

Name the programming responsibility

Decide who prepares the files, who approves revisions, and who resolves a mismatch between the production drawing and the queue. Request confirmation of the software and postprocessor included in the proposal. Do not infer compatibility solely because two systems both mention a common file format.

A useful comparison ends with a defined set of jobs, a documented machine configuration, and identified work remaining before installation. It should also list the cases not demonstrated. That creates a better basis for a follow-up visit than an unsupported forecast of kitchens per day.