TITAN 4000 product file: model size, tool pockets and placement aids
Compare the 4700 and 4800 against the parts, tooling and preparation your shop needs.
Compare the 4700 and 4800 against the parts, tooling and preparation your shop needs.
Park’s TITAN 4000 router family includes the 4700 and 4800. The manufacturer describes laser-assisted pod and part placement, a 21-horsepower belt-drive spindle and a helical rack-and-pinion drive system. The family-level feature list also advertises capacity for up to 68 toolholders, which should be read alongside the selected model’s actual configuration.
Read the selected model, not only the headline
On the retrieved product page, the displayed TITAN 4700 specification table lists 36 tool pockets. The family description separately identifies an eight-by-sixteen-foot work area for the 4800. These are useful examples of why a buyer should preserve the selected model and option list when recording specifications.
Park also describes an ArmorDeck work surface and laser calibration feedback at the operator interface. Application, tooling and workholding decisions need review through the machine’s qualified training and supplier documentation; a feature list does not establish a setup for a particular part.
Turn the specification into a reference sheet
Record the quoted model, usable work area, included tool capacity, placement system and required installation clearances. Have the supplier resolve differences between the webpage, brochure and proposal before an order is approved. Keep that sheet with commissioning and training records so the team can identify the equipment it actually owns. The existing buying guide covers job-mix evaluation; this file focuses on distinguishing the configuration details behind that comparison.
Source & further reading
Product records for this article
- TITAN 4000 series — sources, check date and demonstration questions
Original product reference based on current manufacturer documentation, checked 2026-09-14. Configuration and application need confirmation with the supplier; no independent equipment test is claimed.
Editorial approach & corrections →
